America’s “New Economy” Essay

As the 1900s gave way to the sensitive millennium, it became increasingly clear that a bracing era in the Statesn (and world) history had begun. The old era had been predominate by the Cold War struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union. The innovative era was defined by the rise of a untested global economythe shipway in which the worlds peoples lived, worked, and g all overned themselves. world-wide communication, trade, and capital flow all grew rapidly (Griffith, baker 531). The United States rosaceous to creation the near military unitful military supremacy nation in the world due to Reagan and Bushs destruction of the Cold War, bridging the 80s into the refreshful 90s. George Bushs CIA and ambassadorial run through provided the Statess key to our orthogonal policy negotiations, aiding in our nations leadership over the world. This vote down and new era caused our domestic and social nightclub in state of wardly the States into a state of confusio n and caused the Statesns to question what role they would play in this new society.Not only did the Cold War define Americas stance in the world, dictating foreign policy choices from southeast Asia to Latin America it defined the contours of domestic politics as well, (Chafe 549). How can we gestate now after September 11, that we windlessness or always take over had leadership or supremacy in this world? How could the heart of our pastoral be damaged so much affecting our nation as a whole? This recent tragedy damaged the core of our field of studyism changing foreign and domestic policy after the 90s. During the 90s, a time of new cultural expression and power, the US was instinctive to use any economic, policy-making, or military force necessary to go on the new global system.After the Reagan legacy, Pre stancent Bill Clinton created the New Democrats, which, sought-after(a) to replace the partys older industrial and agricultural bases with a new, if unwieldy, alignme nt of women, minorities, social liberals, and technical progressives, (Griffith/Baker 533). In looking at Chapter 14 in Griffith/Bakers Major Problems in American History Since 1945 and Chapter 16 and the Epilogue in Chafes The Unfinished Journey, we will dig the new goals and values of both(prenominal) the USs domestic and foreign policies, and find that although positive changes shed taken place since 1945, the US stable is yet to live in a society free of homelessness, poverty, and law-breaking reflected by the tenacious power of race, class, and gender blocking the path towardmugwump freedom.Throughout American history, the slew of freedom has always prevailed and equality of e very matchless wasnt brought up until the early to mid 1900s. The peoples dependence and underlying trust within the government to withhold and protect has put our society on a roller coaster of trust, distrust, and betrayal.the Nixon presidency and his foreign policy breakthroughs with China and R ussia had barely taken hold before the devastating constitutional crisis of Watergate occurred, threatening to undermine the very structure of the American governmental system and peoples self-assertion in it. Followed quickly by the nations first defeat in war (Chafe 497).Busch had decided non to respond to much of the conflicts happening with Gorbachev, because if he had, it could have created greater instability, more violence, and a stronger likelihood of counter democratic action, such as the Soviet Union. Busch in causing the two-superpower leaders to arrive at a new arms control treaty that promised the reduction of nuclear weapons arsenals of the world. Buschs only major error was quickly recovered by quickly becoming Yaltsins allies, beginning a new coalition where both world powers would enforce world peace. After Desert Storm, the US entered a prolonged recession causing confusion amongst Americans because Busch didnt wish nearly domestic policies.Because of Buschs carelessness of domestic policies, it reflected upon the public not caring about domestic policies nor within the government. The new immature sort out in America was created by the new elections. Clinton bringing a new young light to society during the election of 1992 believed that through the idealism during the sixties were those which should be reflected upon now during the 90s. Clintons ideas were investing to create new jobs, supporting new technology, rebuilding the nations infrastructure, and creating a new partnership between pluckment and labor to increase American productivity and competitiveness in world markets. The major political campaigns were advancing with technological advances with campaignsportrayed through the amazing new power of talk-show journalism.Ross Perots ideals, opposite of Clintons, were expressed through talk-show journalism shaping political dialogue and activity. Many talk show hosts provided a direct issuance for politicians to reach the Am ericans at home through television. The political wars went on and with Clinton winning the democratic election. This allowed Americans to dig themselves out of their deepest problems by re-imagining themselves and fulfilling their dreams. Clinton was face with issues similar to Franklin Roosevelt, in the midst of the Great Depression, they were in many ways far more complicated and intractable, calling upon the same breadth and knowledge of leadership skills that FDR had deployed in the 1930s, (Chafe 512).As one magazine wrote, what excites people about Clinton, is precisely the degree to which he speaks to their hunger for meaning and purpose, their half sure and often inchoate desire to transcend the selfishness and meaningless of materialistic and self-conceited society, (Chafe 511). Clintons gay policy in the war, fagt ask, dont tell, were looked at as actions profoundly alienating liberals and gays. His next policy, national Healthcare, failed to the Republicans criticizi ng and ultimately causing his policy to disintegrate.This was Clintons down and thought it was over until the American society regained confidence with him when he passed a bill which caused restrictions on free access to handguns and assault weapons. He also created the Americorps, a young group of people volunteering to work among Americas disadvantaged populations. Finally touching up on domestic policies, the American society gained faith in him.The 1994 elections were antithetical and Clinton was on his way to coming back. He wanted to represent a Democratic smaller government. Richard Norris guiding Clinton, made him invulnerable to the issues of high taxes, crime, welfare, federal official budget, and affirmative action which Republicans could use against him. Clinton defined positions that would seem reasonable to the conservative voters and also portray the Republicans as radicals seeking to overturn 60 eld of progress and advance his own agenda on issues that cut in his direction such as education, the environment, and womens rights. Clinton proved to the public that the Republicans chiefly Dole was a threatto the middle class stability, and eventually won the election exclaiming, the era of big government is over. The voters decision was for a change integrity government,not for one party over another. Only by ensuring that one party could balance and counter the other, they seemed to be saying, could the nation be defend from moving too far either toward liberalism and big government on the one hand, or toward conservatism and the end of entitlements on the other, (Chafe 527).Americans wanted politicians to stay fresh down a middle path, not straying to either side too far.Although race had been dealt with by the government, it still defined power, control, status, economic opportunity, and freedom. This issue has improved dramatically, just now race has always been the central theme to American history. It has been so much misconstrued, th at the issue of racial discrimination had disappeared as a matter of public concern, convinced that there was no longer a reason to think of blacks and whites as having different life chances(Chafe 528). Los Angeles embodied most of the multiracial demographic complexity which is where many blacks were suppressed although given still given suppositional equal rights opportunities.One example being the back up virus. Treatment was available to the suppressed society, but werent able to yield the medication. The Rodney King incident was appalling and the only way to describe the finding of fact was what Chafe wrote, It was as though the jury had taken a hallucinogenic dose that altered totally what others saw as reality and the drug was race, (Chafe 529). The police officers caught on tape for the beating got off because of whites ruling the jury. O.J. being convicted of murder and having a black jury was pleaded not guilty. Benjamin barber brings up a point of political futures neither being democratic.the forces of international jihad and the forces of McWorld operate with equal strength in opposite directions, the one control by parochial hatreds, the other by universalizing markets, the one re-creating ancient subnational and heathenborders from within, the other making national borders porous from without. They have one subject in common neither offers much hope to citizens looking for possible ways to govern themselves democratically, (Griffith/Baker 542).September 11 brought forth something America had never faced before, an attack on our home ground. Since this attack the society has been more conservative, realizing that America is not this leadership nation that watches over the world, but is just as suseptable to attack as anyone else is. This attack has brought all families circumferent and brought out American patriotism from within. The attack has put American flags on Football players helmets as well as all sports jerseys. What are we su pposed to believe from the media, articles saying that information being portrayed to us is ill-judged and defying. Although we have gone through a roller coaster of events both ups and downs, America has always recovered and adapted to the changes in front of us.The Progressive polity Institute believes that the latter is true and that the challenge now is to learn how to manage and govern in an era of sustained and constant innovation and adaptation, (Griffith/Baker 536). The 90s was a major turning point in America being the end of the old millenium and the start of a new one, allowing us to look at what is needed to be done both in domestic and foreign policy for this world and our society to go on. the 1990s embodied a summing-up of what had occurred in the preceding decades, as if the artless were searching to find some way through the maelstrom of conflicting currents to a final sense of direction that might represent a new consensus on how to proceed, (Chafe 498).