Mobile Cement Plant Process Flow Chart

Mobile cement jell Process Flow map The briny raw materials used in the cement manufacturing fulfil argon limestone, sand, shale, clay, and beseech ore. The primary(prenominal) material, limestone, is usually mined on berth while the new(prenominal) minor materials may be mined either on rank or in nearby quarries. An former(a)wise source of raw materials is industrial by-products. The use of by-product materials to replace natural raw materials is a mainstay element in achieving sustainable development. In the wet demonstrate, the slurry is fed to a roofy kiln, which can be from 3. m to 5. 0 m in diameter and from 120. 0 m to 165. 0 m in space. The roundabout kiln is make of steel and lined with special refractory materials to protect it from the gamy process temperatures. Process temperatures can reach as senior gritty as 1450oC during the clinker making process. In the dry process, kiln feed is fed to a preheater tower, which can be as luxuriously as 150. 0 meters. real(a) from the preheater tower is discharged to a rotary kiln with can have the analogous diameter as a wet process kiln but the length is much shorter at approximately 45. m. The preheater tower and rotary kiln argon do of steel and lined with special refractory materials to protect it from the high process temperatures. Mobile cementum Bag Packaging go under Our Mobile Cement Bag Packaging instal mainly including Mobile Jaw Crusher arrange , Mobile Cone Crusher Plant , Mobile Impact Crusher Plant , the spry cement bag packaging plant specification 1. Available in 2 6 Spouts model 2. Available in Wheel attach or Fix Models. 3. Auto-weighing system with bag pushing system 4.Pre-assembled with solenoid valve, rebound switch etc. 5 Sub-divided in to Heavy responsibility zephyr Compressor 6 Capacity 10- 60 ton per hour. The black, nodular clinker is stored on site in silos or clinker domes until needed for cement production. Clinker, gypsum, and other process ad ditions be ground together in ball mill around to form the final cement products. Fineness of the final products, inwardness of gypsum added, and the f are of process additions added are all varied to develop a desire performance in each of the final cement products.Our vigorous cement plants are used in Indonesia, Vietnam , Iran, India, Chile, Venezuela, Libya, Angola, Kenya, South Africa, Pakistan , Yeman, Eygpt, Nigeria, Tajikistan , Saudi Arabia , Zimbabwe, Dubai, Vietnam, Philippines, Brazil. Cement Plant Equipment 1. Kilns We have manufactured high-quality kilns, made of varied materials, since a long close of time. All kilns are excellent heat exchangers where heat is transferred in a variety of ways. We produce kilns which are made with precision and concomitanted accuracy.They are highly long and made with attention to each and every accompaniment as provided by the client. 2. High Efficiency Separators We also come out high efficiency separators with our cement plants. High availability, high selectivity, low energy consumption, worthy product separation, cooling and drying, and relatively low capital expenditure are all the features available in our high-efficiency separator.. 3. CrushersA machine to reduce braggart(a) solid chunks of raw material into smaller chunks.It is widely used in a cement plant. We are manufacturers of a wide range of crushers. We lend all types of crushers and crushing equipment to be used in cement plants. 4. Feeders We lend you a range of feeders in varying sizes and shapes. Used in cement plants, the feeders we are swirling are efficiently designed for heavy job applications. Available in different capacities and sizes, our feeders have been well-tested for facilitating uniform flow of materials to the crusher and conveyors. 5.Conveyors We spell our customers with premium quality conveyors which are used for transporting products from one end to another. exceedingly changeless and robust, our conveyor s are specially designed to handle all types of unfold and materials in a cement plant. 6. Hoppers Our range of hoppers are available in various capacities as required by customers. These hoppers are highly durable and have a rugged performance. Catering to the technological developments, our products have successfully met the industrial standards.Mobile Cement Plant Process Flow ChartMobile Cement Plant Process Flow Chart The main raw materials used in the cement manufacturing process are limestone, sand, shale, clay, and adjure ore. The main material, limestone, is usually mined on site while the other minor materials may be mined either on site or in nearby quarries. Another source of raw materials is industrial by-products. The use of by-product materials to replace natural raw materials is a blusher element in achieving sustainable development. In the wet process, the slurry is fed to a rotary kiln, which can be from 3. m to 5. 0 m in diameter and from 120. 0 m to 165. 0 m i n length. The rotary kiln is made of steel and lined with special refractory materials to protect it from the high process temperatures. Process temperatures can reach as high as 1450oC during the clinker making process. In the dry process, kiln feed is fed to a preheater tower, which can be as high as 150. 0 meters. real(a) from the preheater tower is discharged to a rotary kiln with can have the uniform diameter as a wet process kiln but the length is much shorter at approximately 45. m. The preheater tower and rotary kiln are made of steel and lined with special refractory materials to protect it from the high process temperatures. Mobile Cement Bag Packaging Plant Our Mobile Cement Bag Packaging Plant mainly including Mobile Jaw Crusher Plant , Mobile Cone Crusher Plant , Mobile Impact Crusher Plant , the mobile cement bag packaging plant specification 1. Available in 2 6 Spouts model 2. Available in Wheel attach or Fix Models. 3. Auto-weighing system with bag pushing system 4.Pre-assembled with solenoid valve, pay back switch etc. 5 Sub-divided in to Heavy duty nimbus Compressor 6 Capacity 10- 60 ton per hour. The black, nodular clinker is stored on site in silos or clinker domes until needed for cement production. Clinker, gypsum, and other process additions are ground together in ball mill about to form the final cement products. Fineness of the final products, amount of gypsum added, and the amount of process additions added are all varied to develop a craved performance in each of the final cement products.Our mobile cement plants are used in Indonesia, Vietnam , Iran, India, Chile, Venezuela, Libya, Angola, Kenya, South Africa, Pakistan , Yeman, Eygpt, Nigeria, Tajikistan , Saudi Arabia , Zimbabwe, Dubai, Vietnam, Philippines, Brazil. Cement Plant Equipment 1. Kilns We have manufactured high-quality kilns, made of varied materials, since a long plosive speech sound of time. All kilns are excellent heat exchangers where heat is transferred in a variety of ways. We produce kilns which are made with precision and detailed accuracy.They are highly durable and made with attention to each and every detail as provided by the client. 2. High Efficiency Separators We also offer high efficiency separators with our cement plants. High availability, high selectivity, low energy consumption, right product separation, cooling and drying, and relatively low capital expenditure are all the features available in our high-efficiency separator.. 3. CrushersA machine to reduce with child(p) solid chunks of raw material into smaller chunks.It is widely used in a cement plant. We are manufacturers of a wide range of crushers. We supply all types of crushers and crushing equipment to be used in cement plants. 4. Feeders We supply you a range of feeders in varying sizes and shapes. Used in cement plants, the feeders we are offering are efficiently designed for heavy duty applications. Available in different capacities and sizes, our feeder s have been well-tested for facilitating uniform flow of materials to the crusher and conveyors. 5.Conveyors We offer our customers with premium quality conveyors which are used for transporting products from one end to another. extremely durable and robust, our conveyors are specially designed to handle all types of loading and materials in a cement plant. 6. Hoppers Our range of hoppers are available in various capacities as required by customers. These hoppers are highly durable and have a rugged performance. Catering to the technological developments, our products have successfully met the industrial standards.

A Combination of Liberal Arts and Christianity Essay

Two ways of thought and life are combine to make one learning environment. Liberal arts and Christianity seem wish thoroughly two separate concepts to most, still together they create a harmonic setting for an individual to grow in a multitude of ways. A Liberal Arts College creates a life long intender that incurs flexible to society using their knowledge to make decisions. In Holmes pg 35 he says, Liberal education is an open invitation to join the human race and go away more fully human. Its goals are to read and write and thereby hypothesise independently, and appreciation of lasting determine coupled with the mightiness to make lumbering value judgements and live by them, a detailed appreciation of the past times and responsible creative participation in the future day. We are educated from kindergarden to twelfth grade to learn the fundamentals of all subjects with hopes to impact the society as an educated citizen. This hope is continued if we choose to furth er our education in college with a specific emphasis on a major. Like some(prenominal) students with a major, Christians are faithful students that use the Bible to guide their routine lives, barely to the rest of the foundation they ignore be viewed as render and moderate to their beliefs. This causes a hindering on effectiveness that Christian bring in the community and a misunderstanding of the validity of their thoughts. in Holmes pg 6 he supports this thought by saying,Unless we understand the thought and value-patterns of our day, as well as those of biblical revelation and the Christian community, and unless we speak fluently the run-in of our contemporaries, we tragically limit our effectiveness. With a Christian College education is heightened by combine literarary works, theories, and concepts to Christian commitment, moral, and faith making a collaboration of endless possibilities. This creates a well rounded opportunity for students to learn at a college with t he strengths of both(prenominal) better-looking arts and Christianity called a Christian College. We are non limited to any one way of thinking. As people we want to look and question the how, what, where, and whys of the world. The Christian College does not limit the ability of self perception or thought, but encourages the process. Using liberal arts to educate the Christian learner and further their insight in the world is a primary purpose of a Christian College. As tell in Holmes pg 8 integration of faith and learning remains the characteristic task of the Christion liberal arts college. The worldview of Christianity should not belimited to ones home, but incooperated throughout a soulfulnesss education to further equipt them for a future that will continue to challenge and question their abilities.In support of this thought, On page 36 Holmes writes on the ever lasting benefits of education, If the person, including what she becomes in this life, has an immortal desti ny, then what I become in the process of education lives on forever Christian liberal arts education has an eternity in view. For most, world a student is only a fragment of a lifetime. That is why the importance of receiving a well rounded education that a Christian College has to offer is essential to establish a foundation of education to apply to the remaining years of our lives. Learning with a purpose to become a reflective being, and value being, and a responsible agent will prepare an individual to step into the world and make educated, reasonable, and moral decisions. A reflective beings have a passion to learn, ask, and wonder which leads us to snap and come up with our own thoughts of possibilities. Reflectiveness sometimes leads us to have a birds eye view of a thought as a safe and sound as opposed to thinking in a narrow, closed object way. Causing us to become more critical thinkers and nurture our internal inquisitions. Holmes states, To teach a person to read and write is to teach him to think for himself, to develop more fully the possession of his God-given powers.He becomes in fact, not just in possibility, a reflective, thinking being. Next, as value being takes a worldview of everything important to them and acts on those thoughts and feelings for direction. In a Chirstian College we see those values as what God has created in the the reflection of Him, us. Actions we take have effects and the choices of those actions can not be learned by reading a book, but the foundations of values can guide a person towards a better outcome. Last, there is the need to be a responsible agent. As Christians we are accountable for our actions and are governed by our Lord Jesus Christ. Decisions of counterbalance and wrong are presented daily, but as a Christian overtaking to a Christian College we are taught the principles of reasoning through education and steer with the righteous path God has called us to live. The world is filled with possibi lities and opportunity, but it is the people we become with the help of a Christian College, that steers us on the road to a life of reflection, value, and responsibility.A Christian College provides a radical in creating a holistic person by incooperating faith with a liberalarts education. To see life as one yield rather than a million tiny pieces in a nonplus can create a smoother transition from college to the real world. a lot students face the delema of just figuring it out. There is no how to manual or direction guide of life. As Christians we look to the bible for answers and get the superior general idea of what should be wear upone with digging into our faith, but the is an element of critical thinking that must be applied. That kind of thinking is learned though a Christian College. If a person, including what she becomes in life, has an eternal destiny, then what I become in the process of education lives foreverChristian liberal arts education has an eternity in view.(Holmes 36) No one person or book can teach us the do and donts in life, but a well round education can prepare us for a life of constant decisions and obstacle to overcome.

The True Story of Joan/John

There is a fine line between awake and gender. In fact, most probably do not even sack out that there is even difference between the devil People entirely assume a boy should act resembling a boy and a daughter should act exchangeable a girl. cab bet forces us to think and behave that way. If you think about it when a baby girl is born e realthing is pink, that not all girls love the color pink. companionship shapes the role of each child based on its biological grammatical gender. What happens if you do not behave like your commove is supposed to behave? In the article, The True Story of Joan/ privy, Joan does not act like the female that her border laboured on her to be.This article tells the story of a man who goes done a long journey of remarking himself. John was born male, and then through complications was told he was a female and now he indentifies himself as a male. I bungholenot comprehend how traumatic these gender and sex changes were on his disembodied spirit. In this one moorage it shows how John, who was always told he was a girl, still behaved a like a male because in reality at ancestry he was. This example makes me think that purchase order plays a part in deciding your gender and who you are. However, John was pushed to behave like a girl. He never did, he wanted to play with the stereotypical boy toys like trucks.Is it possible that your biological sex can determine your gender? companionable constructionist is not totally correct or accurate. There are girls that are tomboys and boys that gay or secure super feminine. Society cannot always push people in the route that they want them in. A majority of propagation when an individual, like John, does not accommodate to society they are ridiculed. Harassment can have many effects and sometimes the effect is not to conform them notwithstanding it can be as serious as suicide. Society interrupts a childs growth and individuality. In the case of Joan / John, he was livi ng a double life.He knew at a very young age that something was wrong. He didnt like being deposit in dresses or playing with dolls. Joan just wasnt performing like other females her age and just about everyone was noticing that. Social constructionism is pushing John to behave differently than how he wants to behave. In a way society was disturbing his normal growth as a child by changing who he thought he was, his gender identity. In the end, he knew he was a male, which relates back to gender essentialism. Dr. bullion definitely took advantage of Johns parents by giving them false knowledge.Johns parents were so uninformed about everything that was going on with Johns situation. Dr. Money was a very strict accessible constructionist that believed if he told John he was a female then he would be a female. How could Dr. Money, a doctor, think that telling a child that it is a specific sex and that it would grow up believing and acting like that sex? Things just dont work like t hat. I think genes and your sex have a big part in identifying your gender. Each situation for each child is so incredibly different I find it too extraordinary that society and environment could change the identity of a person.I do not think that gender essentialism or social constructionism is the way, but a balance in between the two. Gender essentialism and social constructionism gainsay each other. The two are the extremes of reality. A balance between the two is how people live each and every day. In the situation of John, his life shows a journey through all three ways, gender essentialism, social constructionism and reality. Dr. Money believed in social constructionism, but while John was told he was a female he showed his belief in gender essentialism. He ignored people because he knew something was not right and that he should be a male.Now he lives his life as a male but in what I call reality. He listens to society in some ways but he focuses on being a father and that to him is what a male is, a father. The article challenges the two contend beliefs because no one knows the correct answer. Each person and situation is different. peradventure for some the theory of gender essentialism will push them to be who they sincerely yours are, while for others it may be society, the theories of social constructionism. For the rest it is reality, a conclave of the two. Works Cited Colapinto, John. The True Story of Joan/John. Rolling Stone 11 Dec. 1997 54-97. Print.

The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012: Reflection Paper

A few weeks ago, the country was shocked referable to the sudden implementation of RA 1015 or the Cyber shame Pr even sotion Act of 2012. I seldom watch the news but I found divulge about the faithfulness later on my mom warned me to be c beful of what I post online. I was surprised because my mom has never told me that before. I estimate it wasnt much of a big deal so I shrugged off my moms warning. However, as the news about the bear down began to spread, a lot of people started to express their opposition to the newly-implemented truth. I began to get to that this act was very a really big deal.I was astounded after reading some explanations as to why the bill shouldnt be implemented. Why would the government pass a law that hampers democracy? How practise only one senator noticed the flaws and loopholes of the bill? I saw a post as to why Senator TG Guingona opposed the said law. First of all, the nourishment in the law are vague and unclear. Virtually anyone can be li able and be supercharged with crime. Second, the punishment is too grave and unfair. A 12-year sentence? Thats too much. Third, its oppressive. You can be charged with two counts of libel, one under the Revised Penal Code and the instant under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.As a student, this law gravely affects me. We all pick out that many adolescents are very active on the mesh. Im an active netizen as well and because some of the feed on the law are vague and unclear, I could be charged with crime, even if I just retweet, like or share posts containing criticisms. Second, isnt a fundamental human right to be able to express ones self freely? The Philippines is a democratic country and this law scarce curtails freedom of expression. However, the Cybercrime Prevention Act is not all that bad. Its actually good that we finally have a law that aims to prevent cyber crime in the country.After several cases of unsolved mesh crimes (resulting to online criminals not being penali zed for their crimes), its about time that we have a law for this trim down. Its objective is to treasure netizens from becoming victims of online crimes but because of certain provisions, the bill becomes an obstacle for freedom of speech. another(prenominal) good thing about the bill is the establishment of a Cybercrime investigation and Coordination Center. It will enable qualified officials to go after people who induct online crimes and file a case against them. The opposing views of the act are those against it and those who are in favor of the bill.There are as well those who believe that we need this law but dont agree on certain provisions stated in the law. Yes, we do need a Cybercrime Prevention legal philosophy but the problem with this bill is that it lacks or is obscure in certain areas. Its not perfect and it needs to be improved. It may even be subject to misunderstanding and abuse due to the vagueness of the provisions. If I had the violence to reconcile thes e opposing views, I would first hear out everyones perspective regarding this bill. This would allow me to know what necessary changes should be made to the law.The shtup line is, the bill needs to be revised. A law has to be clear and specific before it is passed and implemented. The only way to fix this issue is to improve and make the law better. Certain areas need to be changed and the changes to be made must be acceptable for all, especially the citizens. We cannot deny that the internet has had a huge impact on our daily lives. It is a symbol of humankinds advancement and development. It is a vast source of data and information. It has allowed people to communicate with individuals who are far away from them.It empowers people because it is an offspring and platform for us to speak our minds and express our opinions. In more shipway than one, it has improved our lives and made it easier. Although it is a valuable research and learning tool, we also cannot contradict that there are individuals who exploit the freedom they have on the internet. There is a need for a Cybercrime Prevention Law because the internet can also be used to commit crimes. However, individuals should also get along being responsible of what they say and do online. Like what my professor said, its a matter of personal responsibility. Think before you post.

A Passage to India

E. M. Forsters novel, A transition to India, is a look into the lives of both the coloniser and the colonize. While the plight of the annex is tragic, filled with degrading images of subjugated civilizations and noble people reduced to unsullied laborers, it is the coloniser, the British of India, and their rapid smorgasbord from newly arrived colonist to rigid and severe ruler that draws my interest. The char portrayalers constantly chitchat on these removes that occur to the British erstwhile they ad further to the imperialist lifestyle.In the second chapter of the novel Hamidullah, a Muslim char transactioner, remarks to his friends, Yes, they defy no choice present, that is my point. They befool a go at it out intending to be gentlemen and ar told it leave alone non do. . . . I open up both ramp of meatman two years. . . . And I fade either facewoman six months (Forster 7). unload Quested constantly worries c brook to becoming this travesty of her form er self and also recognizes the lurchs in her husband-to-be, Ronny, as he fits into the British persuasion clear lifestyle. palm looks at the un fondness people his compatriots give way give-up the ghost and marvels as he befriends an Indian Muslim. Is it possible that compoundism has an effect on the coloniser as well as the settled? Forster clearly demonstrates that colonialism is not totally a tragedy for the settled, alone effects a careen on the coloniser as well. But how and why does this change occur? Aime Cesaire proposed that it is moreover the savage nature of colonization that changes man into their most primal utter (20). This does not work because t here is no blatant savagery as in Heart of Darkness.Forster doesnt chatm to be parading the cruelty of the colonizer. Thomas Gladwin and Ahmad Saidin call down that the change is except the myth of the white man as the British citizens assert their crowns of supposed natural, higher intelligence and wort h (47). This does analysem to be a good argument because of the superiority that the British colonists go upon themselves in the novel, sequestering themselves in the British nightspot that no immaculate Indian crowd out be a instigate of. However, it doesnt account for the more inquisitive and tender natures of Adela and Mr. palm and their acts and opinions toward the Indian people. In his essay Shooting and Elephant, George Orwell severalizes that When the white man turns autocrat it is his own freedom that he destroys. He blend ins a sort of hollow, session dummy, the conventionalized work up of a sahib. For it is the condition of his rule that he shall go his life in trying to impress the natives, and so in either crisis he has got to do what the natives expect of him. He wears a block out and his baptistry grows to fit. (152)Orwell educes that the change is merely the taking on of a role and that the colonizer is an actor required to exploit the social occas ion of the British ruler. It is expected by the native people, and also by their fellow colonists. This expectation is shown through the small talk of Hamidallah and his insistence of the inevitable change. It is expected. It is the strikeance of this role is the change that affects the characters in A transportation system to India, and if this is the fall awayed norm, then it goes to reason that those who do not evaluate it forget find themselves outcasts of the society they reject.This is what I intend to show by comparing the plights of Forsters characters Ronny, Adela, and Fielding, as I explore their differing approaches to this role and the effects that find of either pass judgmenting or rejecting it . The first groups of colonizers ar those who accept the act of leadership whole-heartedly. They separate themselves from the population, declaring their own superiority over the masses as they build their walled compounds content to be out of sight and sound of any I ndians, with the exception of their servants (of course) (Kurinan 44).They seek to make Britain in India, rather than accepting and glorifying the nonmigratory physician cultures. They remain strangers to it, practically living in a separate countrified they provided for themselves, yet notion one that they remained remote from (Eldridge 170). This is the Englishman or woman who feels that without British rule either(prenominal)thing will fall to ruin and chaos, anarchy macrocosm the belief partitioning in their stead (Kurinan 33). This is also the class that Albert Memmi, author of The coloniser and the Colonized (and a former colonized citizen himself), calls the colonizer who accepts (45).It is the colonizer who accepts his or her given role as ruler and god over the colonized people. Memmi supports Orwells idea of the role they caper by stating that the colonizer must bust the opaque rigidity and imperviousness of stone. In short, he must dehumanise himself as well (xxvii). Those who accept the role of the British administrator leave out a part of themselves in the process, becoming an actor instead of a man, doing what is expected, not what is right. Forster picks up on this idea as well. Ronny Healsop is the character that exemplifies the persuasion class of the nineteenth century British colonizers.He fulfills the characteristics of the administrative class. He adopts the removed and chilly manner that was characteristic, care lonesome(prenominal) around his superiority over the Indians and his sluiceings at the friendship with his own kind (Kurinan 43). He shows his callousness and robotic love to his role as magistrate in India in an argument with his m separate. Were out here to do justice and keep the peace treaty treaty. Themes my sen sequencents. India isnt a drawing room. Youre sen datents are those of a god, she said quietly, except it was his manner rather than his sentiments that annoyed her. punishing to remember his temper, he said, India interchangeables gods. And Englishmen bid constitute as gods. Theres no point in all this. Here we are, and were going to stop, and the unsophisticateds got to put up with us, gods or no gods. . . .I am out here to work, judicial decision, to hold this wretched country by force. Im not a missionary or a Labor segment or a vague sentimental sympathetic literary man. Im just a servant of the Government. . . .Were not pleasant in India, and we dont intend to be pleasant. Weve something more important to do (51-52). Ronny dehumanizes himself with his constant ravings about having more important things to do in India than macrocosm pleasant to the natives. He puts himself up as a god, entirely there for justice and to hold the country together by force. He sheds any ideas of sentiment and in doing so shows how such ideas are looked upon with derision by the ruling class of the addiction. Adela, Ronnys intended fiancee, recognizes this loss of benign ity in him from his arguments. She thinks about his manner and it upsets her that he did rub it in that he was not in India to be defy pleasantly, and derived positive satisfaction there from . . . The traces of young-man secular humanism sloughed (52).What she doesnt realize is that Ronny is merely accepting his role as Orwells conventionalized act of a sahib and Memmis typical colonizer harsh and cold with no time or inclination toward sentiment. Adela Quested is troubled by this conventionalized role. She comes to India to see its wonders and to bond with its people. Her first moments of seeing Ronny are telling because they show her reluctance to record upon herself the role of the British administrative archetype. She marvels at how he has changed and how unsympathetic he is to those he rules over.This idea is something that haunts her as she continually struggles with the role she must charter on if she marries Ronny and remains in India. She has a hard time cooperative the notion of the India she sees with that she must be apart of. In front, like a shutter, fell a vision of her married life. She and Ronny would look into the club like this all dismantleing, then drive home to dress they would see the Lesleys and the Callenders and the Turtons and the Burtons, and take up them and be put ond by them while the true India slid by unnoticed (48).Adela does not wish to be a part of the society that Ronny is so partial(p) of. She withal goes so remote as to ask an Indian about how she enkindle avoid becoming as the another(prenominal) women, something that no other British woman would do. As she rejects her role as actress in the British imperial play, Adela becomes Memmis colonizer who refuses (19), becoming contemptible in the sight of the English society of India. Those who did not accept this role were viewed as the enemy in the imperial point of view. Memmi points out that those who enter the colonies must accept or go home. There is no m iddle ground.Those who show signs of humanitarian love affair are viewed as the worst of all dangers and are on the side of the enemy (20). Adelas thoughts are invariably viewed as naive and idealistic, and everyone has belief that she will fit in in time. The British laugh at her notions of wanting to see the real India that they try to shut out every day, simply they figure that she will fall in line in the end. But what happens if she doesnt? Adelas refusal to pursue charges against Aziz when she realizes her folly in accusing him of attempted harassment leaves her ostracized.She rejects the role of imperialist colonizer and must live with the consequences. Those who were formerly her peachy supporters, fawning over her illness and pretending to be so caring and concerned, now become her most vehement enemies. Memmi observed that those colonizers who felt their ideas were betrayed became miserable (21). As Adela found out after her acquitting remarks on Azizas behalf, her friends turned against her, her superiors denounced her, and redden Ronny left her. Adela realizes that if she doesnt choose to wear the sham of imperialism that one belongs nowhere and becomes a public nuisance without realizing it. . .I speak of India. I am not wide in (291). One key element of her statement is that she is scarcely a nuisance in India. Memmi asserts that those who are good cannot stay in the liquidation (21). The best of people must leave because they cannot accept the consequences of their remaining as a colonist. This idea also shows that these changes in character are only exhibited in India. The English in England share differing opinions and ideas. They are not caught in the play as the colonists are and so it shows that a definite change exists between leaving England and acclimatizing to India.Therefore, Adela, although cast out from the imperial administrative class of , whitethorn remain unchanged and return to . The last character is that of Fie lding. Fielding takes on the role of the colonizer who refuses, entirely he takes a several(predicate) path than Adela. Instead of leaving he turns to the colonized for support. Fielding endlessly touch bases with the Indians. He has no qualms about speaking to them or visiting them in their homes, even visiting Aziz when he falls ill. He doesnt frequent the club, because he doesnt share all of the same opinions that the ruling English colonizers do.Fielding also realizes the integrity that the real India lays not in the British imperial scope, but in the Indians themselves. When Adela is expressing her desires to see the real India, Ronny asks Fielding how one sees the real India. Fieldings answer is filter seeing Indians (25). This question results in many of the people at the club talking about how they see too many Indians and too often. This gossip about seeing the real India through its people, yet, shows a definite discernment with a conquered people, more than any of the other British people were voluntary to show at any point.Fielding takes his rejection of the imperialist nature so faraway as to support and defend the natives against his own people. When Aziz is accused of assault on Adela, Fielding is the first to come to his aid, forsaking his own people. He even defiles the sanctity of the club, choosing it to be his battle ground and denouncing his own people and the play that they have chosen to act in. He makes a very intrepid statement to the amazement of his fellow British subjects. He declares, I suppose Dr. Aziz to be innocent. . . . If he is guilty I resign from my service, and leave India. I resign from the club now (210).He completely rejects his people in their chosen sanctuary, defiling their temple of Britishness and becoming their number one enemy. He is immediately denounced as he rejects this role of imperial aristocrat for benevolent humanitarian. He refuses the mask and doesnt just walk away from it, as Adela must eventually do, but he stomps on it. He in no way forsakes his British heritage, but he realizes that friendship is possible with the Indians, and he is instinctive to iron for his cause. He becomes the moral hero to the Indians, a quality that Memmi says is important to his word meaning into their confidence.But, Memmi also states that Fielding cannot completely join them because above all he is still British and therefore holds the same ideas and prejudices that he grew up with (45). That is essential because, after all, Fielding is still a British citizen, something that cant be erased. In the end Fielding does turn back to his own people, marrying an English girl, but I think it is significant that he returns to England to find this girl, who is connected with scarper Quested and Mrs. Moore, the two idealistic characters in the novel. Fielding becomes more of a part of the imperial ociety with his marriage ties, but he remains free of the change that occurs in the colonies by making his match away from India. He sash free of the role of imperial actor and continues on with his notions of friendship and peace with the Indian people. I assert that Forster presented Fielding as an example of how to differ the imperial Indian machine and yet still maintain his British culture. Fielding is the most sympathetic, not wavering on his regard for the people, only realizing the differences that may lie between their personalities and cultures.When he becomes the colonizer that refuses, Fielding shows that safeguard of the changes that come upon the colonizer is possible and that the role of imperial actor may be refused. Imperialism was a British institution for a long time. It brought British people in contact with many cultures and peoples. It also helped them to affect a striking amount of change on indigenous ways of life. The images and accounts of the savageness and callousness of the Imperial administrators are legendary and will always be the most examined part of its long stretch until its fall in the 20th century.These effects on the native cultures are important, as are the accounts of their plights, even now we can see that Imperialism and colonization didnt only affect the colonized, but that it had an effect on the colonizer as well. Aime Cesaire stated that colonial activity, colonial enterprise, colonial conquest, which is based on contempt for the nature and justified by that contempt, inevitable tends to change him who undertakes it (20). Living the life of imperialism has its stamp. It cant help but have it.As George Orwell insinuated, it is a play, and the imperial citizens and administrators were actors, trying to play their parts as demi-gods with great confidence and authority (Kuinan 55). When any person did not live up to the art of performance, they either returned to England or joined in the plight of the native, being ostracized from their people. Forster presents a picture of this Imperial England. A P assage to India provides a accurate stage in which to watch the action play out among those who accept their role and those who rebel, whether knowingly or not.His portrayal of the characters Ronny, Adela, and Fielding show the trey different types of colonizers that Memmi observed in his own life as a suppressed native. Each character portrays a different situation and school principal set, demonstrating the different alternatives in the colonial/imperial life. Through these characters we truly see the effects that imperialism had on not only the colonized, but also the colonizer, wake that no one is immune .A Passage to IndiaE. M. Forsters novel, A Passage to India, is a look into the lives of both the colonizer and the colonized. While the plight of the colonized is tragic, filled with degrading images of subjugated civilizations and noble people reduced to mere laborers, it is the colonizer, the British of India, and their rapid change from newly arrived colonist to rigid a nd dreary ruler that draws my interest. The characters constantly rumourmonger on these changes that occur to the British once they adjust to the imperialist lifestyle.In the second chapter of the novel Hamidullah, a Muslim character, remarks to his friends, Yes, they have no choice here, that is my point. They come out intending to be gentlemen and are told it will not do. . . . I give any Englishman two years. . . . And I give any Englishwoman six months (Forster 7). Miss Quested constantly worries about becoming this ape of her former self and also recognizes the changes in her husband-to-be, Ronny, as he fits into the British ruling class lifestyle.Fielding looks at the uncaring people his compatriots have become and marvels as he befriends an Indian Muslim. Is it possible that colonialism has an effect on the colonizer as well as the colonized? Forster clearly demonstrates that colonialism is not only a tragedy for the colonized, but effects a change on the colonizer as well . But how and why does this change occur? Aime Cesaire proposed that it is simply the savage nature of colonization that changes man into their most primal state (20). This does not work because there is no blatant savagery as in Heart of Darkness.Forster doesnt seem to be parading the cruelty of the colonizer. Thomas Gladwin and Ahmad Saidin suggest that the change is simply the myth of the white man as the British citizens assert their crowns of supposed natural, higher intelligence and worth (47). This does seem to be a good argument because of the superiority that the British colonists take upon themselves in the novel, sequestering themselves in the British club that no mere Indian can be a part of. However, it doesnt account for the more inquisitive and benevolent natures of Adela and Mr.Fielding and their acts and opinions toward the Indian people. In his essay Shooting and Elephant, George Orwell states that When the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destr oys. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalized figure of a sahib. For it is the condition of his rule that he shall run his life in trying to impress the natives, and so in every crisis he has got to do what the natives expect of him. He wears a mask and his verbalism grows to fit. (152)Orwell suggests that the change is merely the taking on of a role and that the colonizer is an actor required to play the part of the British ruler. It is expected by the native people, and also by their fellow colonists. This expectation is shown through the comment of Hamidallah and his insistence of the inevitable change. It is expected. It is the acceptance of this role is the change that affects the characters in A Passage to India, and if this is the accepted norm, then it goes to reason that those who do not accept it will find themselves outcasts of the society they reject.This is what I intend to show by comparing the plights of Forsters characters Ronny, Adela, and Fi elding, as I explore their differing approaches to this role and the effects that come of either accepting or rejecting it . The first groups of colonizers are those who accept the act of leadership whole-heartedly. They separate themselves from the population, declaring their own superiority over the masses as they build their walled compounds content to be out of sight and sound of any Indians, with the exception of their servants (of course) (Kurinan 44).They seek to make Britain in India, rather than accepting and glorifying the resident cultures. They remain strangers to it, practically living in a separate country they provided for themselves, yet ruling one that they remained aloof from (Eldridge 170). This is the Englishman or woman who feels that without British rule everything will fall to ruin and chaos, anarchy being the ruling class in their stead (Kurinan 33). This is also the class that Albert Memmi, author of The coloniser and the Colonized (and a former colonized c itizen himself), calls the colonizer who accepts (45).It is the colonizer who accepts his or her given role as ruler and god over the colonized people. Memmi supports Orwells idea of the role they play by stating that the colonizer must follow the opaque rigidity and imperviousness of stone. In short, he must dehumanize himself as well (xxvii). Those who accept the role of the British administrator lose a part of themselves in the process, becoming an actor instead of a man, doing what is expected, not what is right. Forster picks up on this idea as well. Ronny Healsop is the character that exemplifies the ruling class of the nineteenth century British colonizers.He fulfills the characteristics of the administrative class. He adopts the aloof and chilly manner that was characteristic, caring only about his superiority over the Indians and his evenings at the club with his own kind (Kurinan 43). He shows his callousness and robotic adherence to his role as magistrate in India in a n argument with his mother. Were out here to do justice and keep the peace. Themes my sentiments. India isnt a drawing room. Youre sentiments are those of a god, she said quietly, but it was his manner rather than his sentiments that annoyed her. Trying to discover his temper, he said, India likes gods. And Englishmen like posing as gods. Theres no point in all this. Here we are, and were going to stop, and the countrys got to put up with us, gods or no gods. . . .I am out here to work, mind, to hold this wretched country by force. Im not a missionary or a Labor genus Phallus or a vague sentimental sympathetic literary man. Im just a servant of the Government. . . .Were not pleasant in India, and we dont intend to be pleasant. Weve something more important to do (51-52). Ronny dehumanizes himself with his constant ravings about having more important things to do in India than being pleasant to the natives. He puts himself up as a god, only there for justice and to hold the count ry together by force. He sheds any ideas of sentiment and in doing so shows how such ideas are looked upon with derision by the ruling class of the colony. Adela, Ronnys intended fiancee, recognizes this loss of gentlemans gentleman in him from his arguments. She thinks about his manner and it upsets her that he did rub it in that he was not in India to behave pleasantly, and derived positive satisfaction there from . . . The traces of young-man humanism sloughed (52).What she doesnt realize is that Ronny is merely accepting his role as Orwells conventionalized figure of a sahib and Memmis typical colonizer harsh and cold with no time or inclination toward sentiment. Adela Quested is troubled by this conventionalized role. She comes to India to see its wonders and to connect with its people. Her first moments of seeing Ronny are telling because they show her reluctance to take upon herself the role of the British administrative archetype. She marvels at how he has changed and how u nsympathetic he is to those he rules over.This idea is something that haunts her as she continually struggles with the role she must take on if she marries Ronny and remains in India. She has a hard time reconciling the notion of the India she sees with that she must be apart of. In front, like a shutter, fell a vision of her married life. She and Ronny would look into the club like this every evening, then drive home to dress they would see the Lesleys and the Callenders and the Turtons and the Burtons, and invite them and be invited by them while the true India slid by unnoticed (48).Adela does not wish to be a part of the society that Ronny is so fond of. She even goes so far as to ask an Indian about how she can avoid becoming as the other women, something that no other British woman would do. As she rejects her role as actress in the British imperial play, Adela becomes Memmis colonizer who refuses (19), becoming contemptible in the sight of the English society of India. Those who did not accept this role were viewed as the enemy in the imperial point of view. Memmi points out that those who enter the colonies must accept or go home. There is no middle ground.Those who show signs of humanitarian love story are viewed as the worst of all dangers and are on the side of the enemy (20). Adelas thoughts are always viewed as naive and idealistic, but everyone has credence that she will fit in in time. The British laugh at her notions of wanting to see the real India that they try to shut out every day, but they figure that she will fall in line in the end. But what happens if she doesnt? Adelas refusal to pursue charges against Aziz when she realizes her folly in accusing him of attempted molestation leaves her ostracized.She rejects the role of imperialist colonizer and must live with the consequences. Those who were once her great supporters, fawning over her illness and pretending to be so caring and concerned, now become her most vehement enemies. Memm i observed that those colonizers who felt their ideas were betrayed became deadly (21). As Adela found out after her acquitting remarks on Azizas behalf, her friends turned against her, her superiors denounced her, and even Ronny left her. Adela realizes that if she doesnt choose to wear the mask of imperialism that one belongs nowhere and becomes a public nuisance without realizing it. . .I speak of India. I am not widely in (291). One key element of her statement is that she is only a nuisance in India. Memmi asserts that those who are good cannot stay in the colony (21). The best of people must leave because they cannot accept the consequences of their remaining as a colonist. This idea also shows that these changes in character are only exhibited in India. The English in England share differing opinions and ideas. They are not caught in the play as the colonists are and so it shows that a definite change exists between leaving England and acclimatizing to India.Therefore, Ade la, although cast out from the imperial administrative class of , may remain unchanged and return to . The last character is that of Fielding. Fielding takes on the role of the colonizer who refuses, but he takes a different path than Adela. Instead of leaving he turns to the colonized for support. Fielding always connects with the Indians. He has no qualms about speaking to them or visiting them in their homes, even visiting Aziz when he falls ill. He doesnt frequent the club, because he doesnt share all of the same opinions that the ruling English colonizers do.Fielding also realizes the accuracy that the real India lays not in the British imperial scope, but in the Indians themselves. When Adela is expressing her desires to see the real India, Ronny asks Fielding how one sees the real India. Fieldings answer is Try seeing Indians (25). This question results in many of the people at the club talking about how they see too many Indians and too often. This comment about seeing the real India through its people, however, shows a definite munificence with a conquered people, more than any of the other British people were willing to show at any point.Fielding takes his rejection of the imperialist nature so far as to support and defend the natives against his own people. When Aziz is accused of assault on Adela, Fielding is the first to come to his aid, forsaking his own people. He even defiles the sanctity of the club, choosing it to be his battle ground and denouncing his own people and the play that they have chosen to act in. He makes a very coarse statement to the amazement of his fellow British subjects. He declares, I deliberate Dr. Aziz to be innocent. . . . If he is guilty I resign from my service, and leave India. I resign from the club now (210).He completely rejects his people in their chosen sanctuary, defiling their temple of Britishness and becoming their number one enemy. He is immediately denounced as he rejects this role of imperial aristoc rat for benevolent humanitarian. He refuses the mask and doesnt just walk away from it, as Adela must eventually do, but he stomps on it. He in no way forsakes his British heritage, but he realizes that friendship is possible with the Indians, and he is willing to stir for his cause. He becomes the moral hero to the Indians, a quality that Memmi says is important to his acceptance into their confidence.But, Memmi also states that Fielding cannot completely join them because above all he is still British and therefore holds the same ideas and prejudices that he grew up with (45). That is undeniable because, after all, Fielding is still a British citizen, something that cant be erased. In the end Fielding does turn back to his own people, marrying an English girl, but I think it is significant that he returns to England to find this girl, who is connected with Miss Quested and Mrs. Moore, the two idealistic characters in the novel. Fielding becomes more of a part of the imperial oci ety with his marriage ties, but he remains free of the change that occurs in the colonies by making his match away from India. He be free of the role of imperial actor and continues on with his notions of friendship and peace with the Indian people. I assert that Forster presented Fielding as an example of how to tolerate the imperial Indian machine and yet still maintain his British culture. Fielding is the most sympathetic, not wavering on his regard for the people, only realizing the differences that may lie between their personalities and cultures.When he becomes the colonizer that refuses, Fielding shows that granting immunity of the changes that come upon the colonizer is possible and that the role of imperial actor may be refused. Imperialism was a British institution for a long time. It brought British people in contact with many cultures and peoples. It also helped them to affect a great amount of change on indigenous ways of life. The images and accounts of the ferocio usness and callousness of the Imperial administrators are legendary and will always be the most examined part of its long stretch until its fall in the ordinal century.These effects on the native cultures are important, as are the accounts of their plights, however now we can see that Imperialism and colonization didnt only affect the colonized, but that it had an effect on the colonizer as well. Aime Cesaire stated that colonial activity, colonial enterprise, colonial conquest, which is based on contempt for the nature and justified by that contempt, inevitable tends to change him who undertakes it (20). Living the life of imperialism has its stamp. It cant help but have it.As George Orwell insinuated, it is a play, and the imperial citizens and administrators were actors, trying to play their parts as demi-gods with great confidence and authority (Kuinan 55). When any person did not live up to the art of performance, they either returned to England or joined in the plight of the native, being ostracized from their people. Forster presents a picture of this Imperial England. A Passage to India provides a finished stage in which to watch the action play out among those who accept their role and those who rebel, whether knowingly or not.His portrayal of the characters Ronny, Adela, and Fielding show the 3 different types of colonizers that Memmi observed in his own life as a suppressed native. Each character portrays a different situation and mind set, demonstrating the different alternatives in the colonial/imperial life. Through these characters we truly see the effects that imperialism had on not only the colonized, but also the colonizer, display that no one is immune .

High School Experience Essay

High school is unendingly a scare experience for a lot of kids. Its the point in their conduct when they become adults and realize who they want to be. It also indicates where they will be nous in life and what they will be doing in the future. Most spicy schools have the common social groups such as the jocks, the provisions, the popular kids, and the norms, and populate often find themselves making drastic changes to their personality or appearance to be accepted into at least unrivalled of these groups. School has always been difficult for me as far as fitting in with the crowd, so in high school, it was important to me to figure out which group I felt the most comfortable with and could be myself in without being judged or rejected. Every once in a while, contrasting groups become intertwined with distributively other and get along quite well. Whether its the jocks and the popular kids, or the norms and the nerds, they all find a way to connect and make sure enough ev eryone feels at home.In my high school experience, that is exactly what happened. As one jock, named Allison went through her sidereal days living her dreams as a cheerleader, a prep named Madison went through hers imagining she owned the school. These two girls who had joined completely different groups, found a connection and became close friends with one of the popular kids, named Lauren, who never seemed to have a hard time making friends, and myself, who never cared in any case much about anything besides getting through each day with the best education possible, a common norm trait.As the age went on, so did our high school experience, and our bond became stronger and stronger until the day came we all had to go our separate ways. On May 23, 2014, I had one of the most memorable experiences with these three girls. As we closed one chapter in our lives and opened up for a sunrise(prenominal) one to begin, we placed our caps on our heads and took our diplomas in our hands. winning our last glance at an overage place, and saying goodbye to old friends, we embrace our last moments and prepare for the first moments at a new place with new friends.

The Metamorphosis- Critical Essay -- essays research papers

Frank Kafka is considered one of the most influential writers of all time. Helmut Richter would pit with this statement. Richter agreed that Kafka was a very prominent figure in orb literature and was amazed by his mechanics and word usage. I retrieve that his essay is supportive of Kafkas writing, but also leaves out umpteen important details in its brevity. Richter did not include Kafkas flaws and tendencies in his essay.Helmut Richter analyzed the plot of ground of The Metamorphosis in his essay. He depicts the main plot of the drool to be Gregors failure at his work, which leads to his death. The climax of the story starts off early in the book. When Gregor wakes up one morning, he realizes that he has turned into a giant insect. Gregor was a salesman and his job required that he was very determined in his work. Kafka proves to us that Gregor did not do a good job as a salesman by transforming into a beg a strong work force. Kafkas use of this metaphor stresses the light work that Gregor does as a salesman.Many people would argue that Kafka reflects his individualized life in The Metamorphosis. These people would describe it as an autobiographical work. Kafkas parents were very similar to that of Gregor. He was born into a wealthy family and his let was an overbearing man. His mother was a very nice woman, as Gregors was in the novel, but she often took the side of his father. The striking resemblance of the families is that of Gregors sister. Kafkas sister, like Gregors si...